ALBUM: A Different Kind Of Truth
RELEASED: February 2012
Tattoo/She's The Woman/You and Your Blues/China Town/Blood and Fire/
Tattoo/She's The Woman/You and Your Blues/China Town/Blood and Fire/
Bullethead/As
Is/Honeybabysweetiedoll/The Trouble With Never/
Outta Space/Stay
Frosty/Big River/Beats Workin'
Told ya I was comin' back...
Say ya missed me...
Say it like ya mean it!
If ever an album was all about the numbers it's A Different Kind Of Truth. It is, after all, the first Van Halen album in 14 years and the first Van Halen album with David Lee Roth in 28 years.
Believe me, David Lee Roth has worn far worse outfits than that.
Apart from anything else, it is exciting to find Eddie Van Halen's inimitable guitar (actually imitated by everyone and their dog since 1980) and Roth's over the top persona in the same place once more. It's a combination that gave the band a uniqueness and personality they could never recapture with Hagar, and it's almost surreal to hear them paired up again after so many years, and so many false starts.
And while it would be fair to suggest he may have lost a step or two over the years, Eddie sounds nothing like the sad, drunken mess he appeared to be for much of the last decade. That alone will make A Different Kind of Truth a winning proposition for some, and it's certainly a thrill to hear the man playing again. Likewise, it's a treat to hear Roth back at the top level after a fairly underwhelming two decades of diminishing solo returns. The voice is a little strained, an it's impossible to hide the fact that Roth is not a young man anymore, but there's enough of what once was to fire the memories of anyone who cares.
And the lyrics? They're ridiculous, but as a lyricist Roth has always had a talent for the stoopid (as in, dumb fun) where Hagar was too often guilty of the stupid (as in, this bullshit right here). Sure, by not inviting original bassist Michael Anthony back into the fold, they've lost the distinctive backing vocals that were arguably his biggest contribution to the band, but at the end of the day, this is still clearly and utterly a Van Halen album.
You and Your Blues
It doesn't entirely gel though. The songs are a mixed bag, both across the album and even within themselves. There's nothing truly awful, bar perhaps the cringe inducing chorus of opener Tattoo, but things don't always flow as well as they might. Sure, it sounds great at any given moment, but too many of the tracks fail to equal the sum of their parts, the transitions a little awkward, the writing apparently a little rusty.
Maybe this shouldn't be surprising however. For as many great moments as the classic Van Halen line-up had, they were never the greatest song writers. Excepting the odd true gem, much of their best material was carried by Roth's personality and Eddie's revolutionary playing – often slammed together, rather molded with any great craftsmanship. Both those pieces of the puzzle are in place, but time and context have drained some of the x factor. Tellingly too, a number of tracks have been built upon dusted off demos from the band's golden era. It's a connection with the past they're trying to recapture, but also evidence inspiration may have been thin on the ground.
Tattoo
(they must have spend dozens on this video - and yes, it doesn't synch up very well, does it?)
Blood and Fire
Ultimately though, this is an enjoyable album, and the fans it is targeting will no doubt contentedly crank it to ten and marvel at the fact it even exists. It's far better than one might have expected, but it's also hard to imagine it being in heavy rotation three or four months from now when the thrill of the new has diminished.
I like the way you explain things to your audience in a non-patronising way, instead of taking the attitude that if we're not fans enough to know what you're talking about, we don't deserve to know anyway. It's rare in music writers to be so accommodating, and it's nice.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I don't put any real thought into that sort of thing, so I'm glad it comes across that way. If I did have a mantra, it would probably be that you can never know how much the reader knows, and you can always assume they'd like to know more.
Delete